Sarah King Employment Solicitor Northampton

Excello Law

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
01832 776464

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Services
  • News
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
    • Testimonials – employees
    • Testimonials – employers
  • Events
You are here: Home / Archives for News / News - Employment Tribunal Rules

ET fees unlawful so what next….

26/07/2017 by Sarah King Leave a Comment

Employment Tribunal feesWell having been tipped off in advance that the Supreme Court was to hand down its Judgment in the Unison challenge to Tribunal fees, I was simply in the dark as to the news storm this would create.  I will admit I was surprised that the Supreme Court decided that ET fees were unlawful.  I had not seen the latest evidence but understood really nothing had changed and other Courts had dismissed this evidence already.

Of course, we have far more data now than we had when the challenge was first made as fees have been in place for almost three years but I have to admit I was taken by surprise by the Judgment. A helpful press summary has been prepared for those who cannot face the whole judgment and can be found here.  For those that want more detail, the full judgment of the Supreme Courts decision on ET fees can be found here.

Taking it back to the beginning as a refresher, the aim of ET fees was to try and transfer part of the costs burden from taxpayers onto the users, to deter unmeritorious claims and to encourage early settlement. A fixed fee is payable when a claim is issued and then a hearing fee closer to the final hearing.  The value of this fee is only determined by the type of claim A or B and whether you are personally eligible for fee remission in whole or part.  There is no link to the value of the claim.

In very short summary, the Supreme Court has held that the ET fees regime is unlawful.  The fees are said to interfere with access to justice for both common law and EU laws and contravene the EU law guarantee of an effective remedy before the Tribunal.  Part of the concern is that unlike the County Court fees there is no differentiation according to the value of the claim.  Fees also discriminate against women as women are put at a disadvantage as more bring B type claims (including discrimination) than type A claims.  Whilst the fees may discourage litigants, there is no evidence that these are in respect of unmeritorious claims as the success rate has not changed drastically.  The Supreme Court therefore found them to be unlawful.

In the immediate aftermath of the decision, this raises more questions than answers.  Firstly, the Lord Chancellor’s department has confirmed that all fees paid through the regime to date will need to be refunded.  This is not going to be a quick or easy task. It could be a manual task and what about where the respondent has had to pay the fees and partial remissions.  Refunds to the claimant will not solve this as many insurers or firms have paid these on the claimant’s behalf and also respondent’s may have been ordered to pay them.  This is three year’s of mess to unravel.

Next the ET rules will need to be re-written and immediate changes made to the online claims system to deal with the lack of fees. No doubt HMTS will be looking to bring the IT solutions through as swiftly as possible and stop taking fees immediately.

As a solicitor representing both claimants and respondents in their employment tribunal claims this will have some implications.  Firstly, will my respondent clients see a rise in the number of claims?  This is possible and almost inevitable given the drop off a cliff that we saw in terms of numbers when the fees regime was introduced.  For claimants, this is not likely to immediately impact on my personal work load as if a client can pay a solicitor to advise – fees are less likely to be an issue.  I do not conduct no win no fee work so I cannot expect any increase here but for those with insurance funding I envisage a lot of admin for me as insurers look to the insured to refund and if payment are made back to the card they were taken from this will impact on me.  Indeed with one household name in insurance, we are expected to fund all these fees until the case concludes.  So where we have paid them out this may be an issue that needs to be resolved.

With my judicial hat on as an Employment Tribunal Judge, this is a concern as what about all those claimants who felt unable to bring a claim before and will they now be permitted to do so notwithstanding the time limitation issue.  Was it “reasonably practicable to bring a claim” before when an unlawful regime was in place? or in discrimination claims would it be just and equitable to extend time.  If we are going to see a wave of such claims this could have a huge impact on timetabling.  We know from publically available data that the ET fee regime did not balance the ET books and we were still in deficit.  This is a huge repayment bill and our budget is already being squeezed.  It is quite possible that we will see budget cuts and thus a direct impact on hearing times. There will also be a complex transition when deciding cases in the favour of claimants to try and work out who paid what fees before today will these still be reimbursed or will the claimant now have to await the MOJ huge exercise to work this all out and refund people.

It is going to be a case of watch this space.  All employment solicitors dislike unmeritorious claims but the fact remains these still exist and it is a real risk that people with a justifiable claim have slipped through the net and have not seen justice so now we have to work out what to do next..

 

Tag(s): do I need to pay tribunal fees, employment tribunal fees, employment tribunal; fees unlawful, supreme court judgment on tribunal fees

ET decisions now public

09/02/2017 by Sarah King Leave a Comment

employment tribunal judgments onlineAs previously reported, the MOJ has now launched its online service.  All Employment Tribunal Judgments will now appear on the online database going forward.  In addition, the MOJ has started to upload some of the older 2016 judgments.  You can access the database here.

Having looked at a few searches the functionality seems limited but you can search by subject matter, Judge or party.  Over time this may become a useful resource for ascertaining whether a claimant or respondent has been before the Tribunal before.  It also means that even Tribunal decisions are now public record and this includes any criticisms made of either side in the Judgment.

Tag(s): employment tribunal claims online, employment tribunal representation Northampton, employment tribunal representation Nottingham, employment tribunal representation stamford, online tribunal database, tribunal judgements online, tribunal judgments online

Employment Tribunal Fees Review

01/02/2017 by Sarah King Leave a Comment

Employment Tribunal feesFinally the Government has published its long awaited review of the Employment Tribunal Fees. The Report acknowledges that the drop in claims was significantly greater than it had anticipated for claims post introduction of fees v before. The report accepts that people have been discouraged from making claims but says that there is no conclusive evidence that they have been prevented from doing so.

The Government has analysed the figures and says that people are using other means of resolving the disputes such as ACAS EC.  The Government also accepts that there were a small minority that did not resolve their claims in this way but then did not go onto claim because they could not afford to do so.  It does however make the distinction that this does not mean that realistically they could not afford to pay just that they may have had to make a choice between claiming and reducing areas of non-essential spending.  It also believes that people are not aware of the remission scheme as much as they could.

So Tribunal fees are here to stay for now but instead the Government has proposed a number of changes.  Firstly, extending the fee remission scheme but raising the income threshold for the claimants to apply for remission.  The new gross income threshold for a single person without children is £1,250 which roughly equates to 40 hours at national minimum wage per week.  This threshold will however not be increased in line with increases in national minimum wage. Consultation on this proposal will remain open until March 2017.

The Government is also scrapping with immediate effect the need for claimants to pay a tribunal fee to bring proceedings for recovery from the National Insurance Fund.  This is typically for redundancy and other statutory payments when an employer becomes insolvent. This exemption also includes the more obscure claims in respect of pensions under s28 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993.

You can read the response in full here.

Tag(s): drop in et claims explained, employment solicitor beford, employment solicitor london, government consultation on fee remission, government review of ET fees, why are there so few employment tribunal claims

Financial penalties fail to hit where it hurts!

25/01/2017 by Sarah King Leave a Comment

finanical penaltyOn the 6th April 2014 the Government introduced new financial penalties for employers who lost in the Employment Tribunal.  Employer’s who breached a worker’s rights where there was one or more aggravating features faced potential fines.

In response to a parliamentary question, the business minister admitted this week that it had only been used 18 times since April 2014 and that of those 18 times where a fine was imposed only 12 were paid in full.  Despite a taskforce designed to ensure that judgments are enforced it seems that even the Government is not immune to the same problem employees’ face that they may not actually ever see the money even if they win.  The fines in question go straight to the Government not the worker who rights were breached and has to date netted the Government a mere £17,704.00.

I know from experience that to date the penalties have been little used in practice although it is still relatively new so perhaps it will grow in popularity.  I do not believe that over the past almost 3 years there have only been 18 cases with aggravating features.  It would be interesting to have more information on the news story and the sort of scenarios that Judges are awarding the penalties in.  As always watch this space.

Tag(s): employment tribunal represenation stamford, employment tribunal representation Northampton, financial penalties for employers, fines in employment tribunal, recovery of awards in tribunal, recovery of fines

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Our articles

  • Ask The Expert (7)
  • Events (7)
  • News (299)
    • News – Business Briefing (8)
    • News – Compromise/settlement agreements (13)
    • News – Contracts and Pay (38)
    • News – Discrimination (34)
    • News – Employee share agreements (2)
    • News – Employment Tribunal Rules (58)
    • News – Equal Pay (5)
    • News – Flexible working (1)
    • News – General (11)
    • News – Glossary (3)
    • News – Holidays and Holiday pay (11)
    • News – HR practice (25)
    • News – Maternity leave and paternity (6)
    • News – My news (9)
    • News – National Minimum Wage (11)
    • News – Parental leave (8)
    • News – Redundancy (5)
    • News – TUPE (12)
    • News – Unfair dismissal (31)
    • News – Whistleblowing (8)
  • Publications (1)
  • Testimonials (43)
    • Testimonials – Employees (33)
    • Testimonials – Employers (10)
  • Useful Resources (7)

Looking for something specific?

Our latest events

Discrimination Awareness Workshop

Workshop – Discrimination awareness – 20th October 2021

Workshop – How to handle conduct issues and grievances – 6th October 2021

Workshop – How to handle conduct issues and grievances

Workshop – How to handle conduct issues and grievances – 4th March 2020

Employment Law Update 2020

Employment law update 2020 – 5th February 2020

How to maximise attendance and manage performance workshop

Workshop – How to maximise attendance and manage performance – 7th March 2019

My latest Tweets

  • Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year https://t.co/EIq3uxwvwq 22/12/2020 10:36 am
  • ACAS early conciliation extension https://t.co/EzykpAQZX1 02/12/2020 3:20 pm
  • Good news for business but too late for many now redundant because furlough was ending #toolate £1000 bonus has bee… https://t.co/DpPEtn1JKI 05/11/2020 10:11 pm
  • Furlough scheme extended and JSS delayed by a month. Furlough extension at no % top up just pension and ni to be me… https://t.co/xcULZllN45 31/10/2020 9:47 pm
  • National lockdown from Thursday 😢and furlough to be extended. No idea in what form and whether it will save busines… https://t.co/vRqog54uuZ 31/10/2020 7:35 pm

Latest training

Our Address

Meetings by appointment at:
The Hall
Thorpe St
Raunds
Wellingborough
NN9 6LT

Correspondence address:
Excello Law Ltd
5 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1LG

Other offices:
Chester, Leeds & Liverpool

Sarah King t/a SK Employment Law is not a firm of solicitors. Sarah King is a consultant solicitor at Excello Law Limited and legal services are provided by Excello Law Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA number 512898.

Excello Law is authorised and regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority

· website by Silver Websites · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Site Map ·

Back to Top

This website uses cookies. You may delete or block all cookies from this site in your browser options. By continuing to use this site you accept this. Read More
Accept Reject
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT